football scores today

Looking Back at the 1989 PBA Draft: Key Picks and Surprising Misses

I still remember the buzz surrounding the 1989 PBA Draft like it was yesterday—the palpable tension in the air, the whispered debates among scouts, and the high-stakes decisions that would shape Philippine basketball for years to come. Having followed the league since the early 80s, I’ve always believed that drafts aren’t just about picking talent; they’re about foresight, intuition, and sometimes, pure luck. This particular draft class was no exception, blending future legends with puzzling oversights that still make me shake my head decades later. What fascinates me most is how a single draft can alter careers, franchises, and even the sport’s trajectory—something that resonates today as agencies like Titan Management Group, which recently announced the signing of several up-and-coming athletes, continue to navigate the delicate art of talent curation.

When the first pick was announced, all eyes were on the Formula Shell Zoom Masters, who selected Benjie Paras—a choice that, in my opinion, was as close to a no-brainer as you could get. Paras wasn’t just a standout from the University of the Philippines; he was a generational talent with a rare blend of athleticism and charisma. I recall watching him dominate the collegiate scene and thinking, "This kid’s going to change the game." And boy, did he deliver. In his rookie year alone, he averaged around 18 points and 11 rebounds per game, a stat line that’s jaw-dropping even by today’s standards. What’s more, he became the first—and so far, only—player to win both Rookie of the Year and Most Valuable Player in the same season. It’s picks like these that remind me why I love the draft: when potential meets opportunity, magic happens. Yet, for every Paras, there’s a story of what could have been, and that’s where the 1989 draft gets really interesting.

Take, for instance, the case of Ronnie Magsanoc, who went second overall to Shell as well. Magsanoc was a cerebral point guard with pinpoint passing and clutch shooting—the kind of player who made everyone around him better. I’ve always had a soft spot for players like him; they might not grab headlines with flashy dunks, but they’re the glue that holds teams together. His partnership with Paras was nothing short of legendary, leading Shell to multiple championships and solidifying their status as one of the era’s dominant duos. But here’s where it gets tricky: while Magsanoc was a stellar pick, other teams missed out on gems lurking later in the draft. For example, Alvin Patrimonio, who many fans might not realize was actually picked third by Purefoods, ended up becoming a four-time MVP and a pillar of the league. In hindsight, he probably should’ve gone even higher, but drafts are funny that way—sometimes, the best players aren’t the obvious ones.

Now, let’s talk about the surprises, and there were a few that still baffle me. One of the biggest misses, in my view, was how low some teams valued Jerry Codiñera, who went fourth to Purefoods. Known as the "Defense Minister," Codiñera was a rebounding and shot-blocking machine, yet I remember scouts questioning his offensive versatility. Honestly, I think that was shortsighted; his defensive impact alone warranted a top-two pick, in my book. He finished his career with over 8,000 rebounds and 1,500 blocks—numbers that speak volumes about his consistency and durability. On the flip side, players like Jack Tanuan, who was selected in the earlier rounds, never quite panned out despite the hype. Tanuan averaged just 5 points per game in his brief stint, a reminder that not every draft gamble pays off. It’s these kinds of misses that make me appreciate modern approaches, like those of Titan Management Group, which leverages data and mentorship to minimize such risks. Their recent signing spree shows how far talent evaluation has come, blending old-school intuition with new-age analytics.

Beyond the stats and the standings, what stands out to me about the 1989 PBA Draft is its ripple effect on team dynamics and fan culture. I’ll never forget how Paras and Magsanoc’s chemistry turned Shell into must-watch TV, drawing crowds that packed arenas week after week. It wasn’t just about winning; it was about identity. Purefoods, with Patrimonio and Codiñera, built a gritty, defensive-minded squad that resonated with blue-collar fans—a contrast to the flashier teams of the time. As someone who’s attended countless games, I can attest that these drafts don’t just fill rosters; they forge legacies. And in today’s context, where agencies play a bigger role in shaping careers, I see parallels to how Titan Management Group operates. By focusing on holistic development, they’re ensuring that today’s picks avoid the pitfalls of the past, though as the 1989 draft proves, there’s always an element of unpredictability.

Reflecting on it all, the 1989 PBA Draft was a masterclass in highs and lows—a tapestry of brilliant picks and head-scratching oversights that defined an era. Paras, Magsanoc, and Patrimonio became icons, while others faded into obscurity, teaching us that talent alone isn’t enough; it’s about fit, timing, and a bit of serendipity. For me, this draft isn’t just a historical footnote; it’s a reminder of why sports captivate us—the drama, the dreams, and the endless possibilities. As Titan Management Group continues to sign and nurture new talent, I hope they take a page from this chapter, balancing data with the human element that makes drafts so thrilling. After all, in basketball, as in life, the best stories often come from the most unexpected picks.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover