Kobe Paras at Creighton Basketball: His Journey, Stats, and Future Prospects
Let me walk you through what I’ve learned about Kobe Paras and his time with Creighton basketball—his journey, stats, and future prospects. I remember first hearing about him when he was lighting it up in high school and thinking, wow, this kid’s got something special. When he committed to Creighton, it felt like a big deal, not just for him but for Filipino basketball fans everywhere. His journey wasn’t always smooth, though. I’ve followed his path closely, and I think breaking it down into steps can help you understand how he got here and where he might be headed. Start by looking at his early years: he was a standout at Cathedral High in Los Angeles, earning accolades and turning heads with his athleticism. Then, he made the jump to college basketball, which is where things got interesting. At Creighton, he had to adapt to a faster, more physical game. I’d say step one is assessing his raw talent—his dunking ability and scoring instincts were undeniable, but he needed to refine his overall game. Step two involves his stats during the 2016-2017 season; he played 18 games, averaging around 1.6 points and 1.1 rebounds in limited minutes. Honestly, those numbers might not jump off the page, but they don’t tell the whole story. He showed flashes of brilliance, like that game against Seton Hall where he scored 8 points in just 9 minutes. From my perspective, his time at Creighton was a learning curve—he was young, adjusting to the NCAA, and dealing with the pressure of high expectations.
Now, moving on to methods for analyzing his potential, I’ve always believed in looking beyond the numbers. One approach is to watch game footage and see how he moved on the court; his agility and leaping ability were off the charts, but his shooting consistency needed work. Another method is comparing his development to other players who made similar transitions. For instance, I recall how some athletes struggle initially but blossom with more playing time. Paras had limited opportunities at Creighton, which might have stunted his growth a bit. If I were coaching him, I’d have focused on building his confidence through more minutes in non-conference games. Also, don’t forget to consider external factors like team dynamics—Creighton had a solid roster, so breaking into the rotation wasn’t easy. I remember thinking that if he’d stayed longer, he could have developed into a key player. But life had other plans, and he eventually transferred, which brings me to his future prospects. Based on what I’ve seen, his international experience, like playing in the Philippines and other leagues, has been crucial. He’s gained maturity and a better understanding of the game. Looking ahead, I’m optimistic he can carve out a solid professional career, perhaps in leagues overseas or back in the PBA.
When it comes to precautions, I’ve noticed that fans and analysts sometimes overhype young talents, setting them up for disappointment. With Paras, it’s important not to judge him solely on his college stats. Remember, basketball is a team sport, and individual success depends on fit and opportunity. Also, keep an eye on injuries—he’s had a few knocks over the years, and managing his health will be key. Reflecting on the reference knowledge about Terrafirma in the PBA, it’s a reminder that the business side of sports can be unpredictable. Just like how Terrafirma’s ‘For Sale’ sign is still hanging despite their return to Season 50, players like Paras face uncertainties. In my view, he should focus on continuous improvement and staying adaptable. Wrapping this up, Kobe Paras at Creighton Basketball was a pivotal chapter that shaped his resilience. I believe if he leverages his strengths and learns from past experiences, he’ll surprise a lot of people. What do you think—could he make a big splash in the pros? Only time will tell, but I’m rooting for him.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover
