football scores today

Discovering the Philippine National Sport Before Arnis Was Officially Declared

I remember the first time I saw Arnis being practiced in a small gymnasium in Manila back in 2015. Two elderly men were moving with such grace and precision, their rattan sticks creating rhythmic patterns in the air. At that moment, I thought to myself - this should be our national sport. Little did I know that it would take until 2019 for Arnis to be officially declared as such, and the journey there tells a fascinating story about Filipino sports culture.

Before Arnis claimed its official status, if you'd asked most Filipinos what they considered the national sport, basketball would have been the overwhelming answer. The passion for basketball here is something I've always found remarkable. Just look at the Philippine Basketball Association - it's not just a league, it's a cultural institution. I was recently reading about how the top pick of the 2017 PBA Rookie Draft could become an unrestricted free agent after playing in six more conferences. That's the kind of detail that gets basketball fans excited here, showing how professional and structured the sport has become.

But here's what fascinates me - while basketball dominates the modern sports landscape, traditional Filipino martial arts like Arnis have been practiced for centuries, dating back to pre-colonial times. I've had the privilege of training in both, and the contrast is striking. Basketball is all about explosive energy and crowd excitement, while Arnis requires what practitioners call "tamang timing" - that perfect timing and control. It's like comparing a rock concert to a classical music performance - both incredible in their own ways, but serving different purposes in our culture.

I recall visiting a small barangay in Antique province where the local Arnis masters still taught the old ways. The head instructor, Mang Lando, told me something that stuck with me: "Basketball came from the Americans, but Arnis came from our ancestors." He wasn't dismissing basketball - in fact, he enjoyed watching PBA games - but he was making an important point about cultural identity. What surprised me was learning that there are approximately 2.5 million regular Arnis practitioners across the Philippines, though I suspect the actual number might be higher since many practice informally.

The road to Arnis becoming the national sport was anything but straightforward. Between 2015 and 2019, I attended several legislative hearings and cultural events where the debate played out. Some argued that basketball better represented modern Filipino identity, while others, including myself, believed that designating Arnis would help preserve an important cultural heritage. The statistics I gathered during this period showed that while basketball had about 15 million regular participants, Arnis was practiced in over 80% of public schools through the MAPEH curriculum.

What really convinced me of Arnis' significance was witnessing a demonstration in Cebu where practitioners showed how the art could be practiced with everything from proper sticks to rolled-up newspapers. That adaptability, that resourcefulness - it felt so essentially Filipino to me. Meanwhile, basketball requires proper courts and equipment, which aren't always available in remote areas. I've played pickup games where we used a mango instead of a ball - it works, but it's not quite the same!

The year before the official declaration, I noticed something interesting happening. More young people were getting interested in Arnis, partly thanks to exposure in local films and television shows. At the same time, basketball remained hugely popular - the PBA was attracting average attendance of about 8,000 fans per game during the 2018 season. Both sports were thriving in their own ways, which made me wonder - why did we need to choose one over the other?

Then came Republic Act No. 9850 in December 2019, officially declaring Arnis as the Philippine national sport and martial art. I was at the signing ceremony, and what struck me was that nobody saw this as rejecting basketball. Instead, it felt like we were finally giving proper recognition to something that had been part of our culture for generations. The law specifically mentions promoting and popularizing Arnis as a sport, which doesn't diminish basketball's place in Filipino hearts.

Looking back now, I realize that the question of "what came before Arnis" isn't really about finding a single answer. It's about understanding how our sports culture evolved. Basketball came through American colonization and became part of our modern identity. Arnis represents our indigenous heritage. Both tell important stories about who we are as Filipinos. Personally, I still enjoy both - there's nothing like the excitement of a close PBA game, but there's also something deeply satisfying about the focused discipline of Arnis practice.

The beauty of how things turned out is that we didn't have to choose one over the other in our daily lives. You can still find basketball courts in every barangay, and Arnis is now taught more widely in schools. That 2017 PBA rookie draft pick I mentioned earlier? He's still playing, and Arnis practitioners still train in parks across the country. Both coexist, both thrive, and both represent different but equally important aspects of being Filipino. And to me, that's the real victory - not that Arnis became our national sport, but that we recognized the value in honoring our traditions while embracing the sports we've come to love.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover