football scores today

Discover the Best Size 4 Soccer Ball for Youth Players: Complete Buying Guide

Walking into the sports store last weekend, I overheard a parent asking an employee which soccer ball to buy for their 12-year-old. The employee pointed to three different size 4 balls without explaining why one might be better than another. It reminded me of watching Alas Pilipinas' heartbreaking semifinal loss at the VTV Cup last week - where despite their incredible effort, they fell to defending champion Korabelka in four sets (16-25, 27-25, 17-25, 22-25). Much like choosing the right volleyball strategy, selecting the proper size 4 soccer ball requires understanding both the technical specifications and how they translate to real-game performance for youth players.

I've been coaching youth soccer for about eight years now, and I can't stress enough how crucial ball size is for player development. The size 4 ball, designed for players aged 8-12, represents that critical transition phase where young athletes develop fundamental skills that will carry them through their soccer journey. What many parents don't realize is that using the wrong ball size can actually hinder technique development rather than help it. I've seen countless kids struggle with ball control simply because they're using equipment that doesn't match their physical capabilities.

Let me break down what makes a great size 4 soccer ball. The official circumference should be between 25-26 inches, with a weight of 11-12 ounces. These specifications matter because they create the perfect balance between manageability and realistic gameplay. When I'm selecting balls for my training sessions, I always check the panel construction first. Thirty-two panel balls tend to provide the most consistent flight pattern, though some newer designs with fewer panels have impressed me lately with their improved aerodynamics.

The cover material makes a world of difference in how the ball performs. I've found that TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) covers offer the best combination of durability and performance for most youth players, with PU (polyurethane) being slightly higher-end but more expensive. There's this misconception that more expensive always means better, but honestly, for players under 12, a mid-range TPU ball around $25-35 typically performs just as well as the $60+ options during actual gameplay.

One aspect most buying guides overlook is how the ball feels in different weather conditions. Living in the Midwest, I've seen how temperature and moisture affect different balls. The best size 4 soccer balls maintain their shape and bounce whether it's 45 degrees and drizzling or 85 degrees and sunny. Last season, we tested three different brands across various conditions, and the differences were noticeable - one ball absorbed water like a sponge during rainy practices, becoming nearly 20% heavier and completely changing how players had to strike it.

The bladder type significantly impacts the ball's responsiveness. Butyl bladders retain air better - I've found they typically need inflation only every 2-3 weeks with regular use - while latex bladders offer better touch but require more frequent inflation. For most youth players, I recommend butyl bladders because let's be honest, most parents and coaches don't want to inflate balls before every practice. The air retention rate can vary dramatically between brands; in my experience, higher-quality butyl bladders maintain pressure within 5% of optimal for up to 21 days, while cheaper alternatives can lose up to 15% pressure in just one week.

When it comes to stitching versus thermal bonding, I have a slight preference for thermally bonded balls for youth players. The surface tends to be more consistent, which helps developing players learn proper striking technique. That said, I've worked with hand-stitched balls that performed beautifully, though they typically cost 30-40% more. The reality is that for players under 12, the difference in performance between high-quality thermal bonding and traditional stitching is minimal compared to the importance of proper size and weight.

Looking at the market trends, I've noticed that approximately 65% of youth soccer programs now use size 4 balls with machine-stitched construction and TPU covers, representing what I consider the sweet spot for value and performance. The price range typically falls between $18 and $45, with the $25-30 range offering the best combination of quality and durability based on my experience testing over two dozen models across three seasons.

What really separates adequate size 4 balls from exceptional ones comes down to consistency. The best balls maintain their shape and performance characteristics throughout their lifespan, which for regular use should be at least one full season. I've tracked the performance degradation across multiple brands, and the data shows that premium balls typically retain 85% of their original performance characteristics after six months of regular use, while budget options can drop to 60% or lower.

Much like how Alas Pilipinas demonstrated in their VTV Cup performance that proper preparation and equipment matter at competitive levels, choosing the right size 4 soccer ball sets the foundation for youth players to develop proper technique and genuine love for the game. The 27-25 second set victory against Korabelna shows what's possible when players have the right tools for their level - they can compete with anyone. After all these years coaching, I still get excited seeing that moment when a young player connects perfectly with a well-sized ball, their technique clicking into place because the equipment isn't working against them. That's why taking the time to select the proper size 4 soccer ball matters more than most people realize - it's not just about buying a ball, it's about investing in a child's soccer development.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover