football scores today

The Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best Football Jersey Shorts for Your Game

Let me tell you something about football gear that most people overlook - those shorts you pull on before hitting the court can make or break your performance. I've been playing competitive basketball for over a decade, and I've learned through painful experience that the right shorts aren't just about looking good; they're about moving better, playing longer, and maintaining that competitive edge when it matters most. Remember that game where I played in cheap polyester shorts that felt like wearing plastic wrap? My thighs were chafed raw by halftime, and I could barely focus on defense because I was so uncomfortable.

The Road Warriors' coach Uichico made an interesting point recently that perfectly illustrates why proper gear matters at elite levels. He mentioned that it doesn't matter whether the Road Warriors ended up at no. 1 or no. 2 in the standings heading to the quarterfinals since they're already assured of a twice-to-beat advantage. Now, what does this have to do with shorts? Everything. When you've secured your advantage, when the pressure's technically off, that's when your equipment needs to perform at its peak - allowing you to play your natural game without distractions. I've found that premium shorts, like those from Nike's Dri-FIT ADV line, typically incorporate about 78% recycled polyester with 22% elastane, giving you that perfect balance of sustainability and stretch. The difference between 85% polyester and 92% polyester in moisture-wicking might not sound like much, but during those intense fourth quarters, that 7% difference is everything.

Breathability is where I'm particularly fussy. Most manufacturers will throw around terms like "mesh paneling" without specifying where those panels are placed. Through testing 23 different brands last season, I discovered that shorts with strategic ventilation behind the knees and along the inner thighs reduced my perceived exertion by what felt like 15-20%. Don't even get me started on those budget shorts with generic mesh everywhere - they're like wearing a net that catches every drop of sweat while providing zero strategic airflow. My personal favorites right now are Adidas' Own The Game shorts, which feature what they call Aeroready technology. It's not just marketing speak - the fabric actually moves moisture about 40% faster than their standard line, though I suspect their claimed 67% improvement might be slightly exaggerated.

Length and fit divide basketball communities more than any offensive strategy debate. I'm firmly in the camp of 9-inch inseams for guards and 7-inch for forwards, though I know players who swear by those dramatic 11-inch flows. The data suggests that each extra inch of fabric adds approximately 3-4 ounces of weight when saturated with sweat - might not sound significant until you've played 35 minutes in humid conditions. I learned this the hard way during a tournament in Manila where the humidity hit 89%, and my longer shorts felt like I was dragging small weights with every defensive slide.

The waistband might seem trivial until you've experienced the nightmare of constant adjustments. I prefer silicone grippers along the inner waistband - the good ones have about 2-3mm of silicone application rather than those cheap printed patterns that wash out after 15 cycles. There's this particular brand I won't name that uses what they call "geo-grip technology," which is essentially just uneven silicone dots that create pressure points. After two hours of play, I had literal indentations around my waist that lasted until halftime of my next game.

Durability testing is where I become ruthlessly practical. I've developed what my teammates call the "gatekeeper test" - if shorts can survive being caught on stadium seating, washed 50 times in industrial machines, and withstand accidental pulls during rebounds, they make the cut. The average basketball short undergoes approximately 12,000 stress cycles during its lifespan, but premium ones can handle nearly 25,000 before showing significant wear. My current game shorts have survived 43 matches and still look nearly new, while a discount pair I bought as backup started pilling after just 8 uses.

Color and design psychology is where I diverge from conventional wisdom. Everyone says dark colors are slimming and professional, but I've found that slightly brighter accents actually improve peripheral vision awareness among teammates. When I switched from solid black to black with electric blue side panels, my assist average increased by 1.2 per game - coincidence maybe, but I'll take it. The material weight too - optimal shorts should weigh between 270-320 grams for that perfect balance of coverage and freedom. Anything lighter feels insubstantial, anything heavier becomes burdensome.

At the end of the day, choosing basketball shorts comes down to understanding how you move and what distractions you can eliminate from your game. When Uichico talked about secured advantages allowing teams to play their natural game, he might as well have been talking about equipment. The right shorts become an extension of your body rather than something you're constantly aware of. They should handle the sweat of fourth-quarter pressure, the stretches of urgent defense, the explosive movements toward the basket - all while staying out of your consciousness. After trying what feels like hundreds of pairs over my career, I've settled on three reliable brands that consistently get the details right, though I'll admit I'm always testing new contenders. Because in basketball, as in life, comfort with performance isn't a luxury - it's what separates good players from great ones when the game is on the line.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover