San Miguel vs Ginebra Game 2: Who Will Take the Lead in This PBA Finals Series?
As I settle in to analyze Game 2 of this thrilling PBA Finals series between San Miguel and Ginebra, I can't help but reflect on how coaching dynamics often become the invisible force shaping these high-stakes matchups. Having followed Philippine basketball for over a decade, I've seen numerous coaching duels that ultimately decided championship fates, and tonight's game presents another fascinating chapter in that ongoing narrative. The recent appointment of Gary as the Angels' new head coach, with his wife Lisa joining as assistant coach, actually provides an interesting parallel to what we might see unfold in this finals series - sometimes, the most unexpected partnerships create the most formidable combinations.
When I look at San Miguel's approach in Game 1, what struck me most was their defensive discipline, holding Ginebra to just 42% from the field while forcing 18 turnovers. Those numbers might sound dry, but when you've watched as many finals as I have, you recognize these aren't just statistics - they're the fingerprints of meticulous coaching preparation. San Miguel's coach Jorge Gallent has been quietly building what I consider one of the most systematic approaches in recent PBA history, reminiscent of how Gary is likely structuring his new role with the Angels. There's something about fresh coaching perspectives that can reinvigorate a team's identity, and we're seeing that with both these organizations in different contexts.
Ginebra, on the other hand, has that trademark resilience that coach Tim Cone has cultivated over years. I've always admired how Cone's teams never seem rattled, even when down in a series. They're like seasoned boxers who know how to absorb punches while waiting for their opening. In Game 1, despite the loss, they actually outrebounded San Miguel 48-45 and shot 35% from three-point range compared to San Miguel's 28%. These small victories within defeat often signal a team that's about to make significant adjustments. If I were betting - and believe me, I've been tempted - I'd say Ginebra comes out with more offensive creativity tonight, perhaps running more pick-and-roll actions to exploit San Miguel's defensive rotations.
What many casual observers miss about these coaching battles is how personal relationships influence team dynamics. The mention of Gary and Lisa coaching together for the Angels reminds me of how coaching partnerships often mirror marriage - requiring trust, complementary skills, and sometimes finishing each other's sentences. In this finals, we're seeing something similar with the assistant coaches playing crucial roles that don't always make the highlight reels. San Miguel's defensive coordinator has been particularly brilliant in designing schemes that neutralize Ginebra's transition game, holding them to just 12 fastbreak points in Game 1 after they averaged 18 during the semifinals.
The individual matchups tonight will be absolutely fascinating. June Mar Fajardo, in my opinion, remains the most dominant force in Philippine basketball when he's fully engaged. His 24 points and 15 rebounds in Game 1 weren't just numbers - they were statements. But what impressed me more was his basketball IQ, something that can't be taught. He recognized double teams early and made the right passes, creating 5 assists that don't fully capture his offensive impact. On the other side, Christian Standhardinger brings that European flair and relentless energy that could potentially disrupt San Miguel's defensive schemes if he avoids early foul trouble.
I've noticed that championship series often turn on unexpected heroes, and I'm watching Terrence Romeo's minutes closely tonight. When he gets going, he's virtually unguardable, capable of scoring 15 points in what feels like 90 seconds. His health has been questionable throughout the playoffs, but if he can give them 20 productive minutes, that could be the difference-maker. Similarly, Ginebra's Maverick Ahanmisi showed flashes in Game 1 that suggest he's ready for a breakout performance, hitting 3 of his 7 three-point attempts while playing solid defense.
The venue atmosphere deserves mention too. Having attended numerous games at the Smart Araneta Coliseum, I can attest that the energy there during finals is absolutely electric. The crowd of approximately 15,000 in Game 1 created an environment where momentum swings feel almost physical. Ginebra's "never-say-die" spirit feeds off this energy more than any team I've observed, and I suspect we'll see them harness that homecourt advantage more effectively tonight. Statistics show that teams down 1-0 in PBA finals win Game 2 approximately 58% of the time, and with Ginebra's historical resilience, I'm leaning toward them evening the series.
As tip-off approaches, I keep thinking about how coaching adjustments between games separate good teams from championship teams. The Gary and Lisa coaching dynamic with the Angels exemplifies how modern basketball requires diverse perspectives and collaborative leadership. Similarly, I expect both coaching staffs have spent the last 48 hours dissecting every possession from Game 1, looking for those slight edges that decide championships. My prediction? Ginebra takes this one 98-95 behind a huge performance from Standhardinger and better three-point shooting, but I wouldn't be surprised if Fajardo has another historic performance that proves me wrong. Whatever happens, we're witnessing another classic chapter in this storied rivalry that reminds me why Philippine basketball continues to capture our imagination season after season.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover
