Discover the Hidden Disadvantages of Playing Football You Should Know
When I first strapped on my football cleats back in high school, I never imagined how this beloved sport would shape my life in ways both obvious and subtle. We all know about the glory moments - the roaring crowds, the championship trophies, the camaraderie in the locker room. But today I want to pull back the curtain on aspects of football that rarely get discussed, the hidden disadvantages that can impact players long after they've left the field. This conversation feels particularly timely as I recently discovered through LinkedIn that my former teammate Bishop has already transitioned into the financial industry, a move that got me thinking about the complex relationship between football experience and career development beyond sports.
The physical toll of football extends far beyond the occasional sprained ankle or bruised rib. What many people don't realize is that even players who never suffer dramatic injuries accumulate microscopic damage that compounds over time. I've spoken with former teammates now in their 40s who struggle with arthritis in joints they didn't even remember injuring. Research from the American Journal of Sports Medicine indicates that former football players experience osteoarthritis at rates 2-3 times higher than the general population. The constant impacts, even when they don't result in diagnosed concussions, create a cumulative effect that can surface decades later. I remember joking with teammates about "getting our bells rung" after hard hits, never considering that these moments might be contributing to long-term cognitive issues. The reality is that between 40-60% of high school football players will sustain at least one concussion during their playing career, with many experiencing multiple incidents.
What surprised me most in my own journey was how football shaped my approach to career development in ways that weren't always beneficial. The sport teaches incredible discipline and teamwork, but it can also create a narrow focus that makes transitioning to other fields challenging. My former teammate Bishop's move to finance, which I saw on his LinkedIn profile, represents a path that many football players find difficult to navigate. The same single-minded dedication that makes someone successful on the field can become a liability when they need to develop diverse professional skills. I've noticed that many of us who played football tend to approach corporate environments with the same win-at-all-costs mentality that served us well in sports, only to discover that business success often requires more nuanced strategies.
The time commitment required for football creates another hidden disadvantage that impacts academic and professional development. During my college playing days, I calculated that between practices, film study, travel, and games, I was dedicating approximately 35 hours per week to football during the season. That's essentially a full-time job on top of academic responsibilities. This massive time investment means football players often miss out on internships, networking events, and other career-building opportunities that their peers are accessing. I can't count how many career fairs I missed because of practice or how many networking events conflicted with team meetings. This creates a significant career lag that many players don't recognize until they're already graduated and competing for jobs against peers with more robust professional experiences.
Financial considerations present another layer of complexity that many young players overlook. The average career length in the NFL sits at just 3.3 years, yet many players operate under the assumption that professional football will be their long-term financial solution. Even at the college level, the scholarship system creates a precarious situation where an injury could eliminate both athletic and academic opportunities simultaneously. I've seen talented teammates whose careers ended with torn ACLs during their junior year, suddenly facing the reality of student loans and uncertain job prospects without the scholarship that was funding their education. The harsh truth is that only about 1.6% of college football players will ever make it to the NFL, yet countless young athletes structure their entire educational and career planning around this unlikely outcome.
The psychological transition out of football presents challenges that we rarely discuss openly. For years, your identity becomes intertwined with being a football player - it's how teachers remember you, how classmates identify you, and how you see yourself. When that identity suddenly disappears, whether due to graduation, injury, or simply not making the next level, it creates a void that's difficult to fill. I struggled for months after my final game, feeling untethered without the structure and purpose that football had provided since I was fourteen years old. Seeing Bishop's transition to finance on LinkedIn made me reflect on my own rocky adjustment period and how unprepared I was for life beyond the field.
What's particularly interesting about Bishop's career move is how it represents both a success story and a cautionary tale. On one hand, it demonstrates that football players can successfully transition to demanding professional fields. On the other hand, his LinkedIn profile shows he entered finance several years later than most of his peers would have, putting him at a developmental disadvantage that he'll need to overcome. This pattern repeats across industries - football players bringing tremendous work ethic and team skills to new careers, but often playing catch-up in terms of industry-specific knowledge and professional networks.
The social dynamics within football culture create another set of challenges that extend beyond the sport itself. The hierarchical structure, where coaches hold absolute authority and veteran players command respect from newcomers, doesn't always translate well to modern workplace environments. I've noticed in myself a tendency to defer too readily to authority figures and to avoid questioning processes that could be improved - behaviors that were rewarded in football but sometimes hold me back in my current career. The emphasis on toughness and suppressing emotion can also create difficulties in personal relationships and mental health management long after the playing days are over.
Looking back, I wouldn't trade my football experiences for anything, but I do wish someone had sat me down and explained these hidden disadvantages more clearly. The conversation needs to shift from just celebrating the obvious benefits of sports to preparing athletes for the full spectrum of challenges they'll face. We need better systems to help players develop professional skills alongside athletic ones, and more honest discussions about the long-term physical and psychological impacts of the game. Bishop's successful transition to finance is encouraging, but it shouldn't be the exception - it should become the rule. As much as I love football, I believe we owe young players a more complete picture of how this demanding sport will shape their lives, both during their playing days and long after they've taken off their helmets for the final time.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover