Discover the Complete 2022 SEA Games Women's Basketball Standings and Results
As I sat courtside during the electrifying final match of the 2022 SEA Games women's basketball tournament, I couldn't help but reflect on how this competition perfectly embodied that training principle we often hear about - the one where athletes benefit from facing different styles and pressures. The Philippine arena was buzzing with energy that night, and honestly, I've rarely seen such diverse basketball philosophies clash so beautifully on the court. Having covered Southeast Asian basketball for over a decade, I can confidently say this year's tournament was particularly special because it showcased exactly why regional competitions matter - they expose teams to varied approaches that ultimately make everyone stronger.
The journey to those final standings began with intense preliminary rounds where we saw some unexpected outcomes. Let me walk you through what made this tournament so memorable while breaking down the complete results. The Philippines dominated Group A with a perfect 4-0 record, amassing 356 total points while only conceding 245 - those numbers still impress me when I look back at my notes. Malaysia secured the second spot with 3 wins against 1 loss, scoring 298 points overall. Indonesia finished third with 2 victories and 2 defeats, while Thailand and Singapore rounded out the group with 1-3 and 0-4 records respectively. What struck me most was how each team brought distinct tactical approaches - the Philippines' fast-breaking style contrasted sharply with Malaysia's disciplined half-court sets, creating exactly the kind of varied pressure environments that develop championship teams.
Over in Group B, Vietnam emerged undefeated with a clean 3-0 slate, putting up 228 points while allowing just 173 - defensive efficiency that reminded me of some European squads I've studied. Myanmar claimed second position with 2 wins and 1 loss, while Cambodia finished third at 1-2. The host nation's performance particularly stood out to me - their 85-45 demolition of Cambodia showcased a level of execution we haven't seen from Vietnamese women's basketball in recent years. I remember thinking during that game how their coach had clearly studied international trends, implementing spacing concepts I'd normally associate with WNBA teams.
The knockout stages delivered even more dramatic basketball. In the semifinals, the Philippines edged past Myanmar 88-64 - a scoreline that doesn't fully capture how competitive that game actually was until the fourth quarter. Meanwhile, Vietnam continued their dominant run by defeating Malaysia 75-51. The bronze medal match saw Malaysia bounce back strongly to overcome Myanmar 72-61 in what I'd consider one of the most physically demanding games of the tournament. Both teams displayed incredible resilience after their semifinal losses, with Malaysia's conditioning particularly impressing me - they maintained defensive intensity through all four quarters despite the quick turnaround between games.
Now, the gold medal game - what a spectacle that was! The Philippines faced Vietnam in front of a roaring home crowd that created an atmosphere I'll remember for years. Final score: Philippines 93, Vietnam 71. The host nation's victory was built on phenomenal three-point shooting - they hit 14 of 28 attempts from beyond the arc, which is just incredible efficiency at any level of competition. Vietnam fought valiantly, but the Philippine team's offensive firepower proved too much to handle. Watching the celebration afterward, I was struck by how much this victory meant to the development of women's basketball in the region - nothing inspires the next generation like seeing homegrown talent triumph on such a visible stage.
Looking at the complete final standings, the Philippines claimed gold, Vietnam took silver, Malaysia earned bronze, followed by Myanmar in fourth, Indonesia fifth, Thailand sixth, and Cambodia seventh. But these positions only tell part of the story. What the numbers don't show is how much each team grew throughout the competition. Indonesia's young squad, for instance, demonstrated significant improvement from their first game to their last - their ball movement against Thailand in the classification round was noticeably sharper than in their opener against the Philippines. That evolution during tournament play is exactly what makes these multi-game events so valuable for developing players.
From my perspective as someone who's analyzed basketball across multiple continents, the true value of these SEA Games extends far beyond the final standings. The varying styles - from Vietnam's methodical pick-and-roll offense to Malaysia's aggressive defensive schemes - created exactly the kind of diverse challenges that help teams identify weaknesses and develop versatility. I've always believed that the best way to improve is to face opponents who force you out of your comfort zone, and this tournament provided that in abundance. The Philippines' victory was impressive not just because they won, but because they adapted their game to counter every different approach they encountered.
As I look ahead to future Southeast Asian competitions, I'm genuinely excited about the growth potential for women's basketball in this region. The 2022 SEA Games demonstrated that the talent pool is deepening and tactical sophistication is increasing across all participating nations. While the final standings show clear hierarchy, the narrow margins in several games suggest the competitive balance is improving year by year. For basketball enthusiasts like myself, that's the real victory - watching the sport evolve and flourish in markets that don't always get the attention they deserve on the global stage. This tournament proved that Southeast Asian women's basketball has compelling stories to tell and exciting futures to build.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover