football scores today

Are Xtep Basketball Shoes Worth Buying? An Honest Performance Review

I remember watching the University of Philippines celebrate their Filoil EcoOil Preseason Cup victory last July, and it got me thinking about what separates championship teams from the rest. As someone who's tested over two dozen basketball shoes in the past three years, I've noticed that elite performance often comes down to the footwear supporting the athletes. That's what led me to spend the last six months rigorously testing Xtep basketball shoes - the same brand that's been gaining traction among competitive players in the Philippines and beyond. Let me tell you, the results surprised even me, a self-confessed sneaker skeptic.

When I first unboxed the Xtep Shock the Game 6.0, I'll admit I had my doubts. The retail price of approximately $120 puts it in direct competition with established models like Nike's Giannis Immortality and Adidas' Dame Certified. But within minutes of my initial court test, I realized this wasn't just another budget alternative trying to compete with the big brands. The cushioning system, which Xtep claims uses a proprietary foam compound they've been developing since 2018, provided immediate impact protection that I typically only find in shoes costing $160 or more. During my testing period, I logged about 45 hours across 30 different sessions, ranging from casual shootarounds to full-court competitive games, and the comfort level remained consistently impressive throughout.

The traction pattern deserves special mention because it's where Xtep seems to have invested significant R&D resources. Using a multi-directional herringbone design with what they call "Grip-Tech" compound, I found myself making sharper cuts and quicker stops than I typically do in my usual rotation shoes. On dusty courts - which make up about 60% of the public courts in my area - the shoes maintained approximately 85% of their grip compared to clean court conditions. That's notably better than several mainstream models I've tested recently. The outsole durability has held up remarkably well too, showing only minimal wear after three months of regular use. I'd estimate these could last a serious player about 4-5 months with bi-weekly play before needing replacement.

Now, let's talk about support and lockdown, which is where many budget basketball shoes fall short. Xtep incorporates what they call a "Dynamic Wrap System" that essentially creates a custom-like fit through midfoot straps and internal padding. The first time I laced them up, I noticed how secure my foot felt without any uncomfortable pressure points. During aggressive lateral movements, my foot stayed firmly in place without any slippage. The ankle collar provides substantial support without restricting mobility - a balance that even premium brands sometimes struggle to achieve. I'd rate the overall support at about 8.5 out of 10, which is impressive for shoes in this price category.

The materials selection shows where Xtep made some smart compromises to hit their price point. While you're not getting premium leather or the latest knit technologies, the engineered mesh they use breathes reasonably well and provides adequate durability. After my testing period, I noticed some minor fraying around the toe drag areas, but nothing that compromises the shoe's structural integrity. The construction quality exceeded my expectations - all the stitching remained intact, and there were no glue stains or manufacturing defects that I often see in shoes at similar price points.

What really stood out to me was how Xtep has managed to create a performance package that genuinely challenges the established hierarchy in basketball footwear. Much like how the University of Philippines has maintained their championship trajectory despite other teams' changes, Xtep appears focused on consistent improvement rather than revolutionary reinvention. Their approach reminds me of watching disciplined teams that stick to their system rather than chasing flashy trends. The shoes won't necessarily win style awards or turn heads in the same way limited edition Nikes might, but they deliver where it matters most - on-court performance.

Are there drawbacks? Sure. The colorways tend to be conservative, and you won't find celebrity athlete endorsements driving hype around these shoes. The brand recognition factor is still developing outside of Asia, which might matter to players who care about sneaker culture beyond pure performance. Availability can be spotty in some regions too - I had to order mine through a specialty retailer since they're not carried by major sporting goods chains in my area.

After putting these shoes through every basketball scenario I could imagine, I've come to appreciate what Xtep has accomplished. They've created performance-driven basketball shoes that compete with products costing 30-40% more. For serious players who prioritize function over fashion and want to maximize value, Xtep deserves serious consideration. The brand seems to understand what competitive basketball requires - reliable equipment that performs consistently, much like how championship teams maintain their winning ways regardless of external changes. Would I recommend them? Absolutely, especially for players who go through shoes quickly or want premium performance without the premium price tag. They've earned a permanent spot in my rotation, and I'm genuinely excited to see what Xtep does next.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover