The Ultimate Guide to Understanding English Premiership Football in 2024
As a lifelong football enthusiast and someone who’s spent years analyzing the tactical ebbs and flows of top-tier sports, I’ve always been fascinated by how universal certain principles are. You can watch a basketball playoff series in Manila or a relegation scrap in the English Midlands, and the core narrative often boils down to a brutal, physical contest for dominance. That’s the lens through which I view the 2024 English Premiership season—a relentless, 38-game battle where, much like in that intense Philippine Basketball Association playoff game, the team that controls the fundamental battlegrounds usually controls their destiny. The reference point here is stark: in a crucial Game 1, Rain or Shine was "badly outrebounded... 59-44," a deficit that directly translated to a loss. In the Premiership, we don’t track rebounds, but we have an equally telling metric: the duel for midfield supremacy and second-ball recovery. It’s the same fight, just on a different pitch.
This season, more than any I can remember, has been defined by this kind of physical and tactical attrition. The era of pure, free-flowing tiki-taka feels like a distant memory. Now, it’s about which team can impose its will in the key zones. Look at Arsenal’s transformation. For years, they were criticized for being aesthetically pleasing but physically lightweight. Now, under Mikel Arteta, they’ve built a midfield and defence that wins duels. They don’t just try to out-pass you; they out-fight you for the right to play. It’s the football equivalent of needing a "Caelan Tiongson" or a "Santi Santillan" — players who might not be the biggest stars but who consistently win their individual battles, grabbing those "seven rebounds each" that keep you in the game. For me, Declan Rice has been that archetype. His acquisition wasn’t just about skill; it was a statement of intent to dominate the middle of the park, to neutralize the opposition’s primary threats before they even materialize.
The parallel to the basketball analysis is almost comically direct. The note that TNT had three players with "10 rebounds each" is a devastating indictment of a systemic failure. In the Premiership, you see this when a team allows an opponent’s midfield trio to all complete over 90% of their passes and have a free reign. Manchester City, on their best days, do this to teams—they don’t just score; they suffocate you by owning every loose ball and every contested space. The "adjustment" needed, as the analysis prescribes, is precisely what separates the great managers from the good ones. It’s what we saw Liverpool struggle with early in the season before finding their new balance. They were getting overrun in transitions, their defensive line exposed. Their Game 2 adjustment was tactical, shifting to a more robust, counter-pressing system that protected their backline. They stopped worrying about dominating possession for its own sake and started focusing on dominating the moments that change games.
Let’s talk numbers, because they tell the real story. While I don’t have the exact Premier League second-ball win percentage in front of me (though I’d wager it correlates strongly with the top four), we can look at duel success rates. The teams consistently in the European places—City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Aston Villa—all rank highly in combined defensive and aerial duel success. It’s a grind. It’s not always pretty. I’ll admit, sometimes I miss the sheer artistry of a past era, but I’ve come to appreciate this modern, holistic battle. It’s why a team like Tottenham, under Ange Postecoglou, is so thrilling and so frustrating. They commit to a front-foot style that is glorious to watch when it works, but they can be brutally punished if the intensity drops for a moment, much like Rain or Shine finding their collective effort "was not enough." One moment of switched-off marking, one lost 50/50 in midfield, and the ball is in your net.
My personal view is that this emphasis on physical and tactical dominance has made the league more competitive than ever. The gap in technical quality between the top and the middle is narrowing, so games are decided by these fine margins: who wants it more in the 85th minute, who is better drilled on set-pieces, who can adapt when Plan A isn’t working. The promoted sides, like Ipswich Town, will live or die by this. Can they organize themselves to withstand the sheer athletic and tactical storm they’ll face every week? It’s a monumental task. The 2024 Premiership, therefore, is the ultimate test of a club’s complete ecosystem—from the manager’s brain to the players’ hearts and lungs. It’s a marathon of Game 2 adjustments. The title, the European spots, and survival will all hinge on which teams best learn the lesson from that basketball court: you cannot be "badly outrebounded" in any department and expect to win. You must own your space, win your duels, and control the narrative of the fight, one contested ball at a time. That’s the beautiful, brutal reality of English football’s top flight this year.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover