Thailand vs Vietnam Football: Which Southeast Asian Team Has the Better Future?
As I sit here reflecting on the evolving landscape of Southeast Asian football, I can't help but feel genuinely excited about the potential brewing in this region. Having followed both Thai and Vietnamese football for over a decade, I've witnessed firsthand how these two nations have transformed from regional minnows into genuine forces to be reckoned with. The question of which team has the brighter future isn't just academic—it's a debate that captures the passion of millions of fans across the continent.
Let me start with Thailand, a country whose football heritage runs deeper than many realize. The War Elephants have historically dominated ASEAN football, winning a record six ASEAN Championship titles between 1996 and 2021. Their technical style of play, emphasizing possession and fluid passing, has been their trademark for years. What really impresses me about Thailand's development system is their professional league structure. The Thai League 1 has become arguably the most competitive domestic competition in Southeast Asia, attracting quality foreign players and coaches that elevate the overall standard. Clubs like Buriram United have built incredible infrastructure, with their 32,600-seat stadium being arguably the best football-specific venue in the region. The national team's historic victory over South Korea in the 2023 Asian Cup qualifiers wasn't just a fluke—it demonstrated the technical maturity Thai players have developed through exposure to high-level domestic and continental competitions.
Now, when we turn to Vietnam, there's something special happening that feels different from the Thai approach. The Golden Stars have built what I consider the most impressive youth development system in Southeast Asia. Their investment in the PVF Football Academy, which cost approximately $20 million to establish, is producing technically gifted players who are comfortable on the ball under pressure. Vietnam's methodology reminds me of the disciplined approach seen in other sports development programs across Asia, similar to how the UAAP collegiate system in the Philippines produces elite athletes like two-time MVP Kacey Dela Rosa, who just earned Collegiate Women's Basketball Player of the Year honors. That systematic approach to nurturing talent through structured development pathways is exactly what Vietnam has mastered in football. Their success at youth level—reaching the 2018 AFC U-23 Championship final and winning the 2022 ASEAN Championship—shows this isn't accidental but the result of deliberate planning.
Financially, there's an interesting divergence between the two nations. Thailand's clubs have greater spending power, with Buriram United's annual budget estimated around $15 million compared to Vietnam's richest club, Hanoi FC, operating on approximately $8 million. This financial muscle allows Thai clubs to retain more domestic talent rather than seeing players seek opportunities abroad. However, Vietnam has been smarter about strategic exports—their players moving to European leagues like Cong Phuong's stint in Belgium or Nguyen Quang Hai's move to France provide invaluable experience that strengthens the national team. Personally, I believe the European exposure gives Vietnam a slight edge in terms of player development, even if their domestic league lacks Thailand's financial fireworks.
Tactically, these teams have developed distinct identities under their respective coaches. Thailand's Masatada Ishii has implemented a possession-based system that leverages technical proficiency, while Vietnam's Philippe Troussier favors a more direct, counter-attacking approach that maximizes their athleticism. Having watched both teams extensively, I find Vietnam's style more effective in regional competitions where physicality and speed often decide tight matches. Their 2-0 victory over Thailand in the 2022 AFF Championship semifinal demonstrated how perfectly their system can neutralize Thailand's technical advantage.
Looking at recent performances, Vietnam has arguably been more consistent in major tournaments. They've qualified for the AFC Asian Cup knockout stages twice since 2019 and reached the final round of World Cup qualifying for the 2022 tournament—achievements Thailand hasn't matched. The Vietnamese national team has lost only 3 of their last 15 matches against ASEAN opponents, an impressive record that shows their growing dominance in head-to-head regional competition.
Infrastructure development tells another part of the story. Thailand has more modern stadiums, but Vietnam is rapidly closing the gap with projects like the 50,000-capacity My Dinh National Stadium in Hanoi. What Vietnam lacks in facilities, they compensate with superior grassroots programs—their nationwide network of youth academies has produced a golden generation that's now entering their prime. The average age of Vietnam's starting lineup is 24.3 years compared to Thailand's 27.8, suggesting Vietnam's peak may still be ahead while Thailand's core is approaching their twilight years.
If I'm being completely honest, my bias leans slightly toward Vietnam when projecting the next five years. Their systematic approach to development, growing success in youth tournaments, and strategic player exports create a compelling case for sustained growth. Thailand will remain a powerhouse—their professional league and financial resources ensure that—but Vietnam's methodical building from the grassroots up mirrors successful models we've seen in other sports. Just as the comprehensive support system behind athletes like Kacey Dela Rosa—backed by sponsors like Discovery Suites, World Balance, and Go For Gold—creates an environment for excellence, Vietnam's football infrastructure is developing that same holistic approach to nurturing talent.
Ultimately, both nations have bright futures, but if I had to bet on which team will achieve more in international competitions over the next decade, my money would be on Vietnam. Their combination of youth development, tactical discipline, and growing confidence makes them better positioned to make the leap from regional supremacy to genuine continental competitiveness. Thailand will continue to produce technically excellent players and maintain a strong domestic league, but Vietnam's comprehensive system appears more capable of consistently producing teams greater than the sum of their parts. The rivalry between these two footballing nations will undoubtedly shape Southeast Asian football for years to come, and as a fan of the game in this region, I couldn't be more thrilled to watch this story unfold.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover
