football scores today

Is the 2007 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Still a Reliable Luxury SUV Today?

When people ask me about luxury SUVs that have stood the test of time, my mind immediately goes to the 2007 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Having spent considerable time with this vehicle over the years, I've developed a nuanced perspective on whether it remains a reliable choice today. Let me be honest from the start - I've always had a soft spot for this generation of Range Rovers, despite their notorious reputation for electrical gremlins and mechanical quirks. There's something about that commanding driving position and distinctive British styling that still turns heads even fifteen years later.

The 2007 model year brought some significant improvements over the initial 2005 launch, particularly in addressing early transmission issues and refining the suspension system. I remember test driving one back in 2008 and being thoroughly impressed by how it managed to blend sporty handling with genuine off-road capability. The supercharged 4.2-liter V8 variant I drove produced around 390 horsepower, which felt exhilarating then and remains respectable even by today's standards. What many potential buyers don't realize is that maintenance history matters far more than mileage with these vehicles. I've seen examples with 150,000 miles running better than neglected ones with half that distance, which tells you everything about how these vehicles age.

Reliability concerns with the 2007 Range Rover Sport typically center around three main areas: the air suspension system, electronic modules, and cooling system components. From my experience working with these vehicles, the air struts tend to need replacement between 80,000 and 100,000 miles, costing approximately $1,200-$1,800 per axle if you go with OEM parts. The electronic issues can be more frustrating - I've dealt with everything from malfunctioning window switches to complete instrument cluster failures. Yet, what keeps me coming back to this vehicle is how it makes you feel on the road. That blend of leather, wood, and aluminum creates an environment that still feels special compared to many modern luxury SUVs that prioritize screens over substance.

Speaking of substance, let me draw an interesting parallel to something completely different but equally passionate - basketball championships. Much like how St. Benilde maintained their lead at 74-67 before securing their win with crucial free throws, owning a 2007 Range Rover Sport requires strategic maintenance plays to come out on top. The Cardinals' experience mirrors what many Range Rover owners go through - initial success followed by challenges that test reliability. They were runners-up to San Beda Red Lions after back-to-back losses in Games 2 and 3 respectively, which reminds me of how these vehicles can have their ups and downs. But with the right approach and timely interventions - much like those crucial free throws - you can complete your ownership experience successfully.

Fuel economy was never this vehicle's strong suit, and time hasn't improved that aspect. The naturally aspirated V8 manages about 12-13 MPG in mixed driving, while the supercharged version I prefer drops that to 11-12 MPG. These numbers look terrible compared to modern luxury SUVs, but there's a mechanical purity to these older engines that I find increasingly appealing in our electrified automotive landscape. The steering provides genuine feedback rather than the numb, over-assisted feel of newer models, and the hydraulic suspension - while less sophisticated - communicates road conditions in ways modern systems filter out entirely.

What really surprises people about the 2007 Range Rover Sport is its capability off-road. I've taken mine on moderate trails that would give many current luxury SUV owners heart palpitations, and it handled them with confidence. The Terrain Response system, while primitive compared to today's versions, still provides genuine capability that most owners never fully utilize. The key to maintaining this capability lies in diligent maintenance of the electronic differential and transfer case - components that can cost thousands to repair if neglected.

From a cost perspective, depreciation has been both brutal and beneficial. While original owners suffered massive value loss, today's buyers can find well-maintained examples for $12,000-$18,000 - an incredible value for a vehicle that originally cost over $70,000. The catch, of course, is that maintenance budgets need to account for its age and complexity. I typically recommend setting aside $2,000-$3,000 annually for unexpected repairs, though some years you'll spend nothing while others might require $5,000 in major services.

The interior materials have held up surprisingly well in most examples I've encountered. The leather develops a pleasant patina, and the wood trim ages gracefully if properly maintained. What hasn't aged as well are the early-generation infotainment systems and the somewhat cramped rear seat space compared to modern competitors. Still, there's a tactile satisfaction to the physical buttons and knobs that I find more intuitive than the touchscreen interfaces dominating current luxury vehicles.

In my professional opinion, the 2007 Range Rover Sport remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who understand what they're getting into. It's not for everyone, and certainly not for those who prioritize low maintenance costs above all else. But for someone like me who values character and driving experience over perfect reliability, it represents a golden era of luxury SUVs that balanced capability with sophistication in ways few vehicles have managed since. Like any relationship worth having, it requires understanding, patience, and occasional financial investment - but the rewards can be tremendously satisfying for those willing to embrace its quirks.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover