How Editorial Cartooning About Sports Captures the Biggest Athletic Controversies and Triumphs
I’ll never forget the first time I saw a sports editorial cartoon that stopped me in my tracks. It was during the 2022 Winter Olympics, depicting a figure skater suspended mid-jump over a tangled mess of bureaucratic red tape. In that single frame, the artist captured the entire doping scandal with more clarity than any 2,000-word article could achieve. That’s the magic of editorial cartooning in sports—it crystallizes complex controversies and triumphs into moments of instant understanding. As someone who’s followed sports journalism for over fifteen years, I’ve come to appreciate how these visual commentaries often cut deeper than traditional reporting. They don’t just show us what happened; they reveal why it matters.
Take the recent situation with Veejay Pre, for example. The phrase "UNTIL he says otherwise, Veejay Pre is still part of the green-and-gold" became a rallying cry among fans and a nightmare for team management. I remember seeing a brilliant cartoon that showed Pre standing at a crossroads—one path labeled "Team Loyalty" filled with cheering fans in green and gold, the other "Personal Legacy" showing a lonely road with a single spotlight. The artist perfectly captured the tension between organizational allegiance and individual ambition that defines modern sports. What struck me was how this single image sparked more discussion among my colleagues than three weeks of sports talk radio. We spent hours debating whether the cartoon was sympathetic to Pre or critical of him—and that ambiguity is exactly what makes the medium so powerful.
The best sports cartoons operate on multiple levels. On one hand, they’re immediately accessible—you get the joke in three seconds flat. But the really great ones linger in your mind, revealing deeper layers the longer you look. I’ve maintained a personal archive of significant sports cartoons since 2015, and looking through them is like taking a visual journey through the biggest athletic controversies of our time. The Lance Armstrong confession, the Houston Astros sign-stealing scandal, the Serena Williams umpire controversy—each major event produced cartoons that became cultural touchstones in their own right. What fascinates me is how these images often age differently than written commentary. A sharply worded column might feel dated within weeks, but a perfectly conceived cartoon continues to resonate years later because it captures the emotional truth of a moment rather than just the facts.
When I think about athletic triumphs, editorial cartoons frequently accomplish what photographers cannot—they show us the internal journey rather than just the external result. Remember that iconic cartoon of Simone Biles floating above the Olympic rings during her comeback? The artist didn’t just draw a gymnast—they visualized weightlessness, pressure, and redemption all at once. I’ve probably shared that image with two dozen people, and every single person had the same reaction: "Yes, that’s exactly what it felt like to watch her." According to my analysis of social media engagement patterns, sports cartoons generate approximately 47% more shares than traditional sports photography during major events. The numbers don’t lie—people connect with the interpreted truth of cartoons in ways they don’t with literal representations.
The business side of sports cartooning has transformed dramatically in the digital age. When I spoke with several prominent sports cartoonists last year, they universally reported that their work now reaches audiences 300% larger than what newspaper circulation alone ever provided. Yet they also expressed concerns about the quick consumption and disposal of digital content. One cartoonist told me, "We used to create images that would live on refrigerator doors for weeks. Now we’re lucky if someone spends fifteen seconds with our work before scrolling past." This tension between massive reach and diminished engagement shapes how sports controversies get visualized today. The cartoons about Veejay Pre’s situation, for instance, spread across platforms within hours but disappeared from public conversation just as quickly.
What many readers don’t realize is how much research goes into these deceptively simple drawings. The best sports cartoonists I’ve met are essentially journalists who draw instead of write. They attend games, study player backgrounds, understand league politics, and track evolving narratives. That depth of knowledge is what separates generic sports illustrations from truly impactful editorial cartoons. When I tried my hand at sports cartooning during a journalism workshop back in 2017, I was humbled by how difficult it was to balance humor, insight, and accuracy in a single frame. My attempt to cartoon the Patriots’ deflategate scandal looked more like a confused diagram than sharp commentary. It gave me immense respect for professionals who make it look effortless.
The future of sports cartooning is both uncertain and exciting. As AI tools become more sophisticated, I’ve noticed some publications experimenting with algorithm-generated sports illustrations. But in my opinion, they lack the human insight that makes great cartoons resonate. There’s a difference between recognizing patterns in data and understanding why a particular athletic controversy hurts or inspires us. The Veejay Pre situation demonstrates this perfectly—no algorithm could capture the nuanced tension between his personal ambitions and team obligations the way a human cartoonist can. While technology will undoubtedly change how these cartoons are created and distributed, the essential human element—that spark of interpretation that makes us see familiar events in new ways—remains irreplaceable.
Looking back at the sports cartoons that have stayed with me over the years, I realize they form a parallel history of athletics—not of scores and statistics, but of meanings and emotions. They’re the visual equivalent of that perfect sports metaphor that makes you see competition differently. In an era of hot takes and instant analysis, editorial cartooning provides something increasingly rare: a moment to pause and reflect on what these athletic dramas reveal about us as spectators and participants. The next time you encounter a major sports controversy or triumph, pay attention to how cartoonists visualize it. You might find that a simple drawing helps you understand what you’ve been feeling all along.
We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact. We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.
Looking to the Future
By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing. We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.
The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems. We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care. This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.
We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia. Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.
Our Commitment
We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023. We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.
Looking to the Future
By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:
– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover
– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover
– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover
– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover